NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Friday said right to live in a pollution free atmosphere was a part of the fundamental right as it struck down Centre’s office memorandum allowing ex post facto or retrospective environmental clearances to projects in violation of norms.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
You may also like
Eurovision Song Contest fans predict Graham Norton will kick off over one major snub
Israeli army kills Palestinian suspect in West Bank
Pep Guardiola raises Crystal Palace complaint as Man City boss explains Dean Henderson row
Golf news: Rory McIlroy violates rules as Scheffler and Rahm on the charge
'I earned £6k in months doing things I loved after building up debts to care for my dad'
